GMAT Focus Edition — Data Insights: Table Analysis · Graphics Interpretation · Multi-Source Reasoning · Two-Part Analysis
Home Course Data Insights Lesson 3
Data Insights Lesson 3 of 20

Data Insights:
Multi-Source Mastery

Skim all tabs in 60 seconds. For each question, identify the right tab(s). Separate stated facts from inferences. Cross-tab synthesis is where points are won.

55 mins
🎯 DI 78 to 90
📚 Prereq: Lessons 1–2
Note: MSR tests your ability to synthesize information across multiple tabs. Skim all tabs first, then tackle each question by going directly to the relevant source.
1

What Is Multi-Source Reasoning?

Multi-Source Reasoning (MSR) presents 2-4 tabs of information — emails, memos, data tables, passages — and asks you to synthesize across all of them. You answer 3 questions per prompt. The skill: know which tab has the answer, and whether it's stated directly or must be inferred.

Sample MSR Structure
Tab 1: Email
Tab 2: Data Table
Tab 3: Memo
From: Sarah Chen, CFO
To: Operations Team
Subject: Q3 Budget Review

Our Q3 operating costs exceeded the $2.4M budget by 12%. The primary driver was supply chain disruption in Southeast Asia, which increased raw material costs by 28% compared to Q2. Marketing spend, by contrast, came in 5% under budget. Please prepare a corrective action plan for Q4 presentation by October 15.
↕ Click tabs to switch between information sources
2

The Multi-Tab Reading Framework

Tab-Reading Priorities
Skim all tabs first (60 seconds). Build a mental map: what type of info is in each tab? Which tabs have numbers? Which have opinions?
For each question, identify which tab is relevant. Don't re-read all tabs for every question — go directly to the source.
Combine information across tabs when required. The hardest MSR questions need data from 2+ tabs to answer correctly.
3

Inference vs. Stated Fact

Stated Fact

Directly in one of the tabs. No interpretation needed.

"Marketing spend came in 5% under budget."

This is stated. You can quote it directly.

Inference

Not directly stated — must be derived from combining facts or logical implication.

"If operating costs exceeded budget by 12% and total budget was $2.4M, then actual operating costs were approximately $2.69M."

Derived by calculation. Not stated explicitly.

Overstep (Wrong Inference)

"The company is in financial trouble." — This goes beyond what the text says. Never choose answers that add information not supported by any tab.

4

MSR Strategy for Each Question Type

Question TypeStrategy
Yes / No / Cannot DetermineFind the tab with relevant data. If data directly answers YES/NO → choose. If data is absent → Cannot Determine.
Must Be TrueThe answer must follow from what is explicitly stated or necessarily implied. One tab's evidence usually suffices.
Cannot Be TrueFind a direct contradiction with a stated fact. Contradictions across tabs are common GMAT setups.
CalculationPull the numbers from the relevant tab(s), compute quickly, and pick the closest match.
5

10 Multi-Source Reasoning Traps

⚠ Reading all tabs for every question

Skim first, then go directly to the relevant tab. Rereading all tabs for each question kills your time.

⚠ "Cannot Determine" is not a cop-out

Choose this only when the tabs genuinely don't contain enough information — not when you're unsure.

⚠ Cross-tab contradiction isn't always error

Sometimes Tab 1 gives an estimate and Tab 2 gives actual data. The discrepancy itself may be the question.

⚠ Inference scope creep

Only infer what the tabs logically imply. Don't bring in outside knowledge about business, economics, or current events.

⚠ Confusing author opinion with fact

In a memo or email, the writer's view is opinion, not verified data. Don't treat assertions as proven facts.

⚠ Missing the "as of" date

Tabs often include time references. Data from Tab 1 (Jan 2023) and Tab 3 (Dec 2023) may be incompatible.

⚠ "Must be True" ≠ "Probably true"

Must-be-true means it's impossible for the statement to be false given the tabs. High confidence is not enough.

⚠ Numbers without context

$2.4M in Tab 1 and $2.4M in Tab 3 may refer to different things. Always check what each number represents.

⚠ Partial reading of a tab

MSR tabs can be long. A student who only reads the first paragraph may miss key qualifying information at the end.

⚠ Combining the wrong tabs

Check WHICH tabs are needed for each question. Combining Tab 1 + Tab 3 when Tab 2 has the answer wastes time and introduces errors.

10 Practice Questions

Q1 of 10
MSR~650

Tab 1 (Email): "Our Q3 operating costs exceeded the $2.4M budget by 12%."
Tab 2 (Data): Q3 Marketing spend = $320,000. Q3 Marketing budget = $336,000.

Question: Based on both tabs, what was the approximate total actual operating cost in Q3?

Explanation: $2.69M. From Tab 1: budget was $2.4M and costs exceeded it by 12%. Actual = $2.4M × 1.12 = $2.688M ≈ $2.69M.
Q2 of 10
MSR~650

Tab 1 (Email): "Marketing spend came in 5% under budget."
Tab 2 (Data): Q3 Marketing spend = $320,000.

Question: Based on both tabs, what was the marketing budget?

Explanation: $336,000. If actual spend = $320K and it came in 5% under budget: actual = budget × 0.95. Budget = $320K / 0.95 ≈ $336,842 ≈ $336K. Tab 2 confirms actual spend = $320K.
Q3 of 10
MSR~600

Tab 1 (Email): "Supply chain disruption increased raw material costs by 28% compared to Q2."
Tab 2 (Table): Q2 raw material costs = $450,000.

Can we determine Q3 raw material costs?

Explanation: Yes — $576,000. Tab 2 gives Q2 raw materials = $450,000. Tab 1 says Q3 is 28% higher than Q2. Q3 = $450,000 × 1.28 = $576,000. This is a cross-tab inference — both tabs are needed.
Q4 of 10
MSR~650

Tab 1 (Memo): "All project deadlines must be approved by the Director before proceeding."
Tab 2 (Email from Director): "I approve deadlines for Projects A, B, and D only."

Based on both tabs, which of the following can be concluded?

Explanation: Project C cannot proceed without further approval. Tab 1 requires Director approval for all projects. Tab 2 approves A, B, D — not C. Therefore, C cannot proceed under current policy. The Director hasn't explicitly disapproved C — just hasn't approved it yet.
Q5 of 10
MSR~700

Tab 3 (Research Note): "Company X's market share grew from 18% to 23% in 2023."

Statement: "Company X's absolute revenue grew in 2023." This statement:

Explanation: May or may not be true. Market share grew, but if the total market shrank significantly, absolute revenue could still decline. For example: old market $1B × 18% = $180M; new market $700M × 23% = $161M. Market share grew but revenue fell.
Q6 of 10
MSR~750

Tab 1 (Survey Results): "72% of employees prefer remote work."
Tab 2 (Policy Memo): "Employees working remotely must log hours in the tracking system."
Tab 3 (IT Report): "Only 45% of employees have logged hours remotely this quarter."

The most logical inference combining all three tabs is:

Explanation: 27% may not be complying. 72% prefer remote (Tab 1), meaning they likely work remotely. Policy requires logging (Tab 2). Only 45% are logging (Tab 3). Gap: 72% − 45% = 27% may be working remotely but not logging — a compliance concern.
Q7 of 10
MSR~700

Tab 1 (Budget): Department A budget = $500K, Department B = $300K.
Tab 2 (Actual Spend): Dept A = $480K, Dept B = $340K.

Which department had a larger percentage budget variance (over or under)?

Explanation: Department B — 13.3% variance. Dept A: ($480K−$500K)/$500K = −4% (under budget). Dept B: ($340K−$300K)/$300K = +13.3% (over budget). Dept B has the larger percentage variance even though its absolute dollar difference is smaller.
Q8 of 10
MSR~650

Tab 1 (News): "TechCorp announced a merger with DataSoft, pending regulatory approval."
Tab 2 (Legal Filing): "The merger is subject to antitrust review, expected to conclude Q2 2024."

Statement: "The merger is complete." This is:

Explanation: Cannot be determined. Both tabs confirm the merger is announced and pending regulatory review. Neither tab states the review outcome. The merger may or may not complete — we don't know the result of the antitrust review from these tabs.
Q9 of 10
MSR~600

An MSR prompt has three tabs: a customer survey, a production report, and a financial statement. The question asks: "Did customer satisfaction improve while costs decreased?" The best approach is:

Explanation: Check both relevant tabs. Satisfaction data lives in the customer survey tab. Cost data lives in the financial or production tabs. A cross-tab question requires checking both sources and verifying that both conditions hold simultaneously.
Q10 of 10
MSR~600

Tab 2 contains a table with columns for Year, Revenue ($M), and Profit ($M). In Year 3, Revenue = $80M and Profit = $12M. Which of the following can be determined directly from this tab?

Explanation: Year 3 profit margin. Profit margin = Profit/Revenue = $12M/$80M = 15%. This calculation is possible with only the data in Tab 2. Revenue growth rate requires Year 2 data (might not be available). Employee count, market share, and marketing spend are not in this tab.
Lesson Summary
Skim all tabs before answering

Build a mental index of where each type of information lives. This saves time on every question.

Stated vs. inferred: different standards

Stated facts can be quoted directly. Inferences must follow necessarily — not just probably.

Cross-tab synthesis is the hardest

Questions requiring data from 2+ tabs are most common at higher difficulty. Practice combining facts.

Cannot Determine is a real answer

Choose it when tabs genuinely lack sufficient data — not when you're uncertain.