GMAT Focus Edition Verbal: Boldface questions test logical architecture. Map the argument before classifying — never reverse this.
Home Course Verbal Reasoning Lesson 11
Verbal Theory • Lesson 11 of 20

CR Boldface &
Argument Role Analysis

Map the full argument first. Classify each bold statement's role precisely: evidence, conclusion, counter-argument, or background. Both labels must be correct.

Time: 55 mins
Target: V78 to V90
Prerequisites: Lessons 1–4 (CR fundamentals)
Course Verbal Reasoning Lesson 11
1

Core Philosophy: Anatomy of an Argument

Boldface questions present an argument with two highlighted (bold) statements and ask you to identify the role each plays in the argument. The question tests your ability to understand the logical structure of an argument at a granular level.

Common roles include: main conclusion, intermediate conclusion (a sub-claim that supports the main conclusion), evidence (a stated fact used to support a claim), background (contextual information, not directly part of the argument), counter-argument (a view the author addresses or refutes), and assumption (something taken for granted).

Core Insight: Read the argument first, map its structure, then classify each bold statement. Never start by reading the answer choices on boldface questions.

2

The Six Roles in a CR Argument

Argument Role Taxonomy
Main Conclusion
The author's primary claim — what the whole argument is trying to establish.
Intermediate Conclusion
A sub-claim that functions as evidence for the main conclusion AND is supported by other evidence.
Evidence / Premise
A stated fact, statistic, or observation used to support a conclusion.
Background
Contextual information that sets the scene — not directly part of the logical chain.
Counter-argument
A view that opposes the author's position, introduced to be rebutted.
Assumption
An unstated premise the argument relies on — rarely explicitly labeled in boldface questions.
3

The Role-Map Strategy

01

Read the full argument first

Understand the whole before classifying the parts. Ignoring the non-bold text leaves you without context.

02

Identify the main conclusion

Find the author's primary claim. Everything else is either supporting it, opposing it, or providing context.

03

Classify each bold statement

For each bold segment: Does it support the main conclusion directly (evidence)? Is it a sub-conclusion? Does it oppose the argument (counter)? Is it context?

04

Match to answer choices

Eliminate choices that mislabel either bold statement. Both labels must be correct for the answer to be correct.

4

Worked Examples

Example 1
"Some economists argue that higher minimum wages reduce employment. However, a comprehensive review of 50 studies found no significant negative employment effects in most cases. This suggests that the employment argument against minimum wage increases is overstated. Therefore, policymakers should not use employment concerns as the primary argument against raising the minimum wage."
Bold 1: Evidence — a research finding that counters the economists' position.
Bold 2: Main conclusion — the author's primary policy recommendation.
Note: The non-bold "This suggests..." is an intermediate conclusion supported by Bold 1 and supporting Bold 2.
Example 2 — Counter + Evidence
"Critics of remote work claim that productivity inevitably declines when employees work from home. But data from our company shows that output per employee increased by 12% during two years of remote operations. Employees also report higher satisfaction. Clearly, the productivity concerns associated with remote work are not supported by our company's experience."
Bold 1: Counter-argument — a position the author is about to rebut.
Bold 2: Main conclusion — the author's primary claim, supported by the data.
5

10 Boldface Traps

1. Conclusion vs. intermediate conclusion confusion

An intermediate conclusion both supports the main conclusion AND is supported by evidence. It is not the final point.

2. Counter-argument labeled as evidence

A view that opposes the author is a counter-argument, not evidence supporting the author.

3. Background labeled as premise

Background sets context and does not logically support the conclusion.

4. One label right, one wrong

Both labels must be correct. A choice that gets one right and one wrong is still wrong.

5. Directional confusion

An answer may say "support" when the bold statement actually opposes the author.

6. Assumption labeled as conclusion

The author never states assumptions — they are implicit, not bold.

7. Evidence labeled as conclusion

A fact that supports a claim is evidence, not a conclusion.

8. Main conclusion mistaken as sub-claim

The final claim is usually the main conclusion, not an intermediate one.

9. Partial-truth trap

An answer correctly describes one aspect of the bold role but adds wrong information.

10. "Explains" vs "supports"

Some choices say a bold statement "explains" the argument — verify whether it actually provides explanation or just evidence.

6

Role Identification Quick Reference

RoleIdentifies AsTest
Main conclusionWhat the argument is fundamentally trying to proveAsk: "What is the author's final claim?"
Intermediate conclusionA sub-claim that is both supported by evidence AND supports the main conclusionCan it be both a "therefore" and a "because"?
Evidence / premiseA stated fact, datum, or findingCould this appear as a premise in a formal argument?
Counter-argumentA position that opposes the author's viewDoes the author address and reject this position?
BackgroundContext that sets the sceneIf removed, does the logical chain break? If not → background.
9

10 GMAT-Style Practice Questions

Select your answer, then reveal the step-by-step explanation. Each question reflects real GMAT difficulty and format.

Question 1 of 10 GMAT Verbal

Researchers studying workplace ergonomics have long noted the health risks of prolonged sitting. A recent study found that employees using sit-stand desks reported 32% less back pain after six months. This finding strongly suggests that sit-stand desks reduce discomfort. Therefore, companies that wish to reduce employee health complaints should invest in sit-stand desks for their staff. The two portions in bold play which of the following roles?

Correct Answer: (B)
(B) is correct. The first bold is a research finding (evidence) that supports the intermediate conclusion "sit-stand desks reduce discomfort." The second bold is the main conclusion: a recommendation for companies. (A) reverses the roles. (C) the first is not background — it is specific new research data. (D) the second is not a counter-argument. (E) the second bold is a clear conclusion, not just evidence.
Question 2 of 10 GMAT Verbal

Many critics argue that social media platforms have contributed to declining mental health among teenagers. However, three large longitudinal studies published over the past year found only weak correlations between social media use and mental health outcomes. The critics' concerns may therefore be overstated. Platforms should not be regulated based primarily on mental health concerns until stronger evidence emerges. The two bold portions play which roles?

Correct Answer: (A)
(A) is correct. The first bold presents a view the author is challenging — a counter-argument. The author then provides evidence against it and draws the main conclusion (second bold): platforms shouldn't be regulated yet. (B) the first bold opposes the author, not supports. (C) the second bold is clearly a conclusion. (D) reverses roles. (E) the first is not background — it is an active counter-claim being addressed.
Question 3 of 10 GMAT Verbal

Coal provides approximately 35% of global electricity generation. Switching to renewable energy sources is both technologically feasible and economically competitive at current prices. Given these conditions, maintaining coal as a primary energy source is no longer justified. Governments should accelerate the transition away from coal-based electricity generation. What roles do the bold portions play?

Correct Answer: (B)
(B) is correct. The first bold is an intermediate conclusion: it claims renewables are feasible and competitive (supported by implied evidence) AND this claim supports the main conclusion (government should act). The second bold is the main conclusion — the author's primary recommendation. (A) the first is not mere background — it is a substantive claim. (C) the second is clearly the main conclusion, not an intermediate. (D) neither is a counter-argument. (E) reverses the roles.
Question 4 of 10 GMAT Verbal

A pharmaceutical company spent $2 billion developing a new cancer drug. Independent clinical trials confirmed that the drug increased five-year survival rates by 40% compared to existing treatments. Despite its high cost, the drug represents a significant medical advancement. Insurance companies that refuse to cover this drug on cost grounds are prioritizing financial considerations over patient outcomes. The bold portions play which roles?

Correct Answer: (A)
(A) is correct. The first bold is a clinical finding — a factual premise supporting the claim that the drug is a significant advancement. The second bold is the author's normative conclusion (a judgment about insurance companies' priorities). (B) the first is a factual finding supporting the argument, not opposing it. (C) neither is an intermediate conclusion — the second is clearly the final point. (D) and (E) reverse roles.
Question 5 of 10 GMAT Verbal

Over the past decade, digital advertising has grown from 15% to 60% of total advertising spend. Television advertising is now less effective at reaching younger demographics than it was five years ago. Digital platforms allow for more precise targeting and real-time performance measurement. Therefore, brands that allocate the majority of their advertising budget to television risk losing relevance with younger consumers. The bold portions play which roles?

Correct Answer: (A)
(A) is correct. The first bold is a factual claim (evidence/premise): TV is less effective with young people. This supports an implicit intermediate conclusion that digital is better, and together with the digital advantages listed, supports the main conclusion (second bold): brands risk losing younger consumers if they over-invest in TV. (B) the first and second are different claims. (C) the first does not oppose the argument. (D) the second is clearly a conclusion with "therefore." (E) the first is not background.
Question 6 of 10 GMAT Verbal

Many nutritionists recommend limiting red meat consumption to reduce cardiovascular disease risk. However, a 20-year study of 100,000 participants found that moderate red meat consumption — three times per week or less — was not associated with significantly elevated cardiovascular risk. This challenges the conventional nutritional wisdom. The recommendation to avoid red meat entirely may need to be revised in light of this new evidence. What roles do the bold portions play?

Correct Answer: (A)
(A) is correct. The first bold is research evidence that challenges the conventional view mentioned in the opening. The second bold is the author's main conclusion: the standard recommendation may need revision. (B) reverses the roles. (C) only the first bold challenges conventional wisdom; the second is the conclusion. (D) the first is not background — it is specific research data. (E) the first is not shared by both sides.
Question 7 of 10 GMAT Verbal

Global plastic pollution has reached crisis levels, with millions of tons entering oceans annually. Extended Producer Responsibility laws, which require manufacturers to fund plastic waste management, have reduced plastic pollution by 30% in every country that has implemented them. Such evidence suggests these policies are highly effective. Therefore, all major economies should adopt Extended Producer Responsibility legislation immediately. The bold portions play which roles?

Correct Answer: (A)
(A) is correct. The first bold is an empirical finding (evidence) supporting the claim that these policies are effective. The second bold is the main conclusion — a policy recommendation. The non-bold "Such evidence suggests these policies are highly effective" is the intermediate conclusion linking evidence to main conclusion. (B) reverses. (C) the second bold is clearly the main conclusion. (D) the first is specific research evidence, not background. (E) the first bold supports the author's argument, not opposes it.
Question 8 of 10 GMAT Verbal

Some economists have argued that universal basic income (UBI) would lead to widespread disincentives to work. A pilot program in Finland involving 2,000 unemployed individuals found that participants were no less likely to seek employment than the control group. Participants also reported better mental health and higher life satisfaction. The work-disincentive argument against UBI does not appear to be supported by real-world evidence. The two bold portions play which roles?

Correct Answer: (A)
(A) is correct. The first bold states the opposing economic view (counter-argument). The evidence (Finland pilot) is then provided. The second bold is the main conclusion: the counter-argument is not supported by evidence. (B) the second is clearly a conclusion. (C) the first is not background — it is an active position being challenged. (D) the first is the view being countered, not the author's main claim. (E) reverses.
Question 9 of 10 GMAT Verbal

Streaming services now account for the majority of global music consumption. Artists who signed major-label deals before the streaming era receive royalties under outdated contract terms that did not anticipate streaming economics. These artists earn far less per stream than newer artists on updated contracts. The music industry needs to renegotiate legacy contracts to ensure fair compensation for all artists. The bold portions play which roles?

Correct Answer: (A)
(A) is correct. The first bold is a factual premise identifying the root problem (outdated contracts). The second bold is the main conclusion — a normative recommendation to renegotiate. (B) reverses. (C) the first is not general background — it is a specific causal premise. (D) the second bold is clearly a conclusion (recommendation). (E) the first does not oppose the author's view.
Question 10 of 10 GMAT Verbal

The average American household spends approximately $1,200 per year on subscription services. Research shows that consumers systematically underestimate how much they spend on subscriptions by an average of 40%. This misperception prevents effective household budget management. Financial literacy programs should specifically address subscription spending awareness to help consumers manage their budgets more effectively. The bold portions play which roles?

Correct Answer: (A)
(A) is correct. The first bold is research evidence (consumers underestimate by 40%) supporting the intermediate conclusion that this prevents good budgeting. The second bold is the main conclusion — a recommendation for financial literacy programs. (B) reverses and mislabels. (C) the second bold is a conclusion, not evidence. (D) the first bold is specific research data, not background. (E) the first is evidence, not an intermediate conclusion.
10

Key Takeaways

1. Map the argument first

Understand the full argument before classifying bold statements. Context is everything.

2. Find the main conclusion

The main conclusion anchors all other role classifications. Everything supports, opposes, or contextualizes it.

3. Both labels must be correct

If even one bold label is wrong, the entire answer choice is wrong.

4. Intermediate conclusions do two jobs

An intermediate conclusion is both supported by evidence and supports the main conclusion.

Lesson 10 All Verbal Lessons Lesson 12